CURRENT TRENDS IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: REMOTE AND HYBRID EMPLOYMENT IN EUROPE (A PANEL ANALYSIS, 2015–2025)

Keywords: human resource management, remote work, hybrid work, panel analysis, labour market, Europe, post-pandemic dynamics

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to identify the determinants of remote and hybrid employment in Europe and to test whether the post-pandemic level of working from home has become a new stable equilibrium rather than a temporary deviation. The relevance of the study stems from the persistent gap between corporate return-to-office narratives and official labour market statistics, as well as from the practical needs of human resource management, for which the choice between office, hybrid and remote regimes has become a standing strategic decision; for Ukraine, remote work has additionally served as a mechanism of preserving employment under wartime displacement. The research is based on a balanced country-level panel constructed from the harmonised Eurostat Labour Force Survey indicator of persons working from home (36 European countries, 2015–2025) combined with country-year data on household internet access, employment in knowledge-intensive services, job vacancy rates and real labour productivity. The methods include two-way fixed effects and random effects panel regressions with cluster-robust standard errors, an event-study specification measuring yearly deviations from the pre-pandemic baseline, and k-means clustering of national trajectories. The analysis distinguishes between-country differences in the level of remote work from within-country dynamics, examines the stability of national trajectories and the presence of convergence, and separates permanent remote arrangements from hybrid ones. The practical value of the article lies in substantiating the priorities of human resource management policy under hybrid work organisation, with managerial attention shifting from technological feasibility to the quality of hybrid work organisation, employee preferences and retention effects.

References

1. Barrero J. M., Bloom N., Davis S. J. Why Working from Home Will Stick : NBER Working Paper No. 28731. Cambridge, MA : National Bureau of Economic Research, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731
2. Aksoy C. G., Barrero J. M., Bloom N., Davis S. J., Dolls M., Zarate P. The global persistence of work from home. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2025. Vol. 122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509892122
3. Bloom N., Han R., Liang J. Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature. 2024. Vol. 630. P. 920–925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2
4. Lott Y., Kelliher C., Chung H. Reflecting the changing world of work? A critique of existing survey measures and a proposal for capturing new ways of working. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research. 2022. Vol. 28, No. 4. P. 457–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221130597
5. Chung H. The Flexibility Paradox: Why Flexible Working Leads to (Self-)Exploitation. Bristol : Policy Press, 2022. 264 p.
6. Dingel J. I., Neiman B. How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics. 2020. Vol. 189. Art. 104235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235
7. Uríen B. Teleworkability, Preferences for Telework, and Well-Being: A Systematic Review. Sustainability. 2023. Vol. 15, No. 13. Art. 10631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310631
8. Ramani A., Alcedo J., Bloom N. How working from home reshapes cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2024. Vol. 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408930121
9. Gibbs M., Mengel F., Siemroth C. Employee innovation during office work, work from home and hybrid work. Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67122-6
10. Handke L., Aldana A. J., Costa P., O’Neill T. Hybrid Teamwork: What We Know and Where We Can Go From Here. Small Group Research. 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241279078
11. Stroom M., Eichholtz P., Kok N. Does working from home work? That depends on the home. PLoS ONE. 2024. Vol. 19, No. 7. Art. e0306475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306475
12. Shen L. Does working from home work? A natural experiment from lockdowns. European Economic Review. 2022. Vol. 151. Art. 104323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104323
13. Aksoy C. G., Barrero J. M., Bloom N., Davis S. J., Dolls M., Zarate P. Time Savings When Working from Home. AEA Papers and Proceedings. 2023. Vol. 113. P. 597–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20231013
14. Munnich A., Kleingeld A., Weijschede J., Danivska V. Exploring hybrid-working preferences of knowledge workers using a stated choice experiment. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-04-2024-0227
15. Employed persons working from home as a percentage of the total employment, by sex, age and professional status (lfsa_ehomp) : dataset / Eurostat. 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2908/LFSA_EHOMP
16. European Working Conditions Survey 2024: First findings / Eurofound. Luxembourg : Publications Office of the European Union, 2025. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/all/european-working-conditions-survey-2024-first-findings
1. Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2021). Why working from home will stick. NBER Working Paper No. 28731. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w28731
2. Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2025). The global persistence of work from home. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509892122
3. Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, vol. 630, pp. 920–925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2
4. Lott, Y., Kelliher, C., & Chung, H. (2022). Reflecting the changing world of work? A critique of existing survey measures and a proposal for capturing new ways of working. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 457–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10242589221130597
5. Chung, H. (2022). The flexibility paradox: Why flexible working leads to (self-)exploitation. Bristol: Policy Press. 264 p.
6. Dingel, J. I., & Neiman, B. (2020). How many jobs can be done at home? Journal of Public Economics, vol. 189, art. 104235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104235
7. Uríen, B. (2023). Teleworkability, preferences for telework, and well-being: A systematic review. Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 13, art. 10631. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310631
8. Ramani, A., Alcedo, J., & Bloom, N. (2024). How working from home reshapes cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2408930121
9. Gibbs, M., Mengel, F., & Siemroth, C. (2024). Employee innovation during office work, work from home and hybrid work. Scientific Reports, vol. 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67122-6
10. Handke, L., Aldana, A. J., Costa, P., & O’Neill, T. (2024). Hybrid teamwork: What we know and where we can go from here. Small Group Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241279078
11. Stroom, M., Eichholtz, P., & Kok, N. (2024). Does working from home work? That depends on the home. PLoS ONE, vol. 19, no. 7, art. e0306475. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0306475
12. Shen, L. (2022). Does working from home work? A natural experiment from lockdowns. European Economic Review, vol. 151, art. 104323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2022.104323
13. Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2023). Time savings when working from home. AEA Papers and Proceedings, vol. 113, pp. 597–603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20231013
14. Munnich, A., Kleingeld, A., Weijschede, J., & Danivska, V. (2025). Exploring hybrid-working preferences of knowledge workers using a stated choice experiment. Journal of Managerial Psychology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/jmp-04-2024-0227
15. Eurostat. (2026). Employed persons working from home as a percentage of the total employment, by sex, age and professional status (lfsa_ehomp) [Data set]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2908/LFSA_EHOMP
16. Eurofound. (2025). European Working Conditions Survey 2024: First findings. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Available at: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/all/european-working-conditions-survey-2024-first-findings
Published
2026-10-29
How to Cite
Dzhumurat, V. (2026). CURRENT TRENDS IN HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: REMOTE AND HYBRID EMPLOYMENT IN EUROPE (A PANEL ANALYSIS, 2015–2025). Entrepreneurship and Innovation, (42), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/42.6