VECTOR OF PRIORITY ALTERNATIVES PROVIDING ECONOMIC SAFETY OF THE ENTERPRISE

  • Nahorna I.I. National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute"
Keywords: vector, priority alternatives, economic safety of the enterprise, components of the enterprise economic safety, hierarchical model

Abstract

The article is dealing with considering effective interaction conditions of the enterprise with the subjects of the external environment, that is, the system of connections and relations that could ensure the enterprises' economic security. The purpose of article is to create a vector of priority alternatives ensuring economic security of the enterprise. In the article it was defined the concept of economic security of the enterprise as a state of balanced economic system of the enterprise internal environment, which is capable of responding adequately to the dynamics of the external environment. It was analyzed the economic system of the enterprise that is capable of adequately and quickly respond to changes in the external and internal environment, as well as their warnings. It was proposed to analyze the economic safety of the enterprise according to the following criteria: financial security, intellectual security, personnel security, technical and technological, political and legal security, information security, innovation safety, environmental safety, power security, and retrospective security. Through multivariate analysis, hierarchy analysis, the explicit form of the mathematical model of the process of ensuring the economic security of the enterprise is established and the influence of various factors on this process is quantified. It was offered the hierarchical model game of determining economic security of enterprises, with further detail on selected full dominant hierarchies at the corresponding levels of the model. When constructing a dominant hierarchy, it was determined that the principle of hierarchical continuity is implemented, according to which the elements of the lower level of the hierarchy are pairwise comparable with each other from the views of the higher-level elements, and this process continuously extends from the top of the hierarchy to its lowest level (alternatives). In order to implement the fourth level of the hierarchical model, it was proposed to use a vector of alternatives priorities, which is determined in accordance with the model of economic security, where the alternatives are represented by the corresponding notations according to the calculated range.

References

Нагорна І. І. Організаційно-економічний механізм у забезпеченні стійкої економічної безпеки промислових підприємств : дис. … канд. екон. наук : 08.00.04. Одеса, 2009. 233 с.

Верченко П. І. Багатокритеріальність і динаміка економічного ризику (моделі та методи) : монографія. Київ: КНЕУ, 2006. 272 с.

Федонін О. С., Репіна І.М., Олексик О.І. Потенціал підприємства: формування та оцінка: навч. посіб. Київ, 2006. 316 с.

Приходько С. В. Формування адекватного реальним виробничо-господарським процесам комплексу заходів реагування на загрози економічній безпеці. Інвестиції: практика та досвід. Київ, 2011. No4. С.52–55.

Васильєв О. В. Формування системи управління економічною безпекою промислових підприємств. Економічний аналіз: зб. наук. праць. Тернопіль, 2013. Том 14. № 2. С. 138–145.

Іванова, Н. С. Сучасні принципи забезпечення ефективної системи економічної безпеки підприємства. Актуальні проблеми розвитку економіки регіону, 2011. Вип. 7(2). С. 57–61.

Ілляшенко С. М. Складові економічної безпеки підприємства та підходи до її оцінки. Актуальні проблеми економіки. 2013., № 3. С. 12–19

Коробчинський О. Л. Методика формування системи економічної безпеки підприємства. Актуальні проблеми економіки. 2009. № 4. С. 41-45.

Nagorna I. I. Organizational and economic mechanism ensuring sustainable economic security of industrial enterprises: Thesis. ... Candidate of Economic Sciences: 08.00.04. O, 2009 – 233 p.

Verchenko P.I. (2006). Multi-criteria and dynamics of economic risk (models and methods): monograph / Kyiv. KNEU, 272 p.

Fedonin O. S., Repin I. M., Oleksyk O. I. (2006). Potential of the enterprise: formation and evaluation: manual. – 2nd edition, unchanged. – K.: KNEU, 316 p.

Prykhodko S. V. (2011), “Formation of a complex of measures for responding to threats to economic security adequate to real production and economic processes”, Investments: practice and experience. No.4, pp. 52 - 55.

Vasyliev, O. V. (2013), “Formation of the system of management of economic safety of industrial enterprises”, Ekonomichnyi analiz, tom 14, vol. 2, pp. 138-145.

Ivanova, N.S. (2011), “Modern principles of ensuring an effective system of the enterprise economic security”, Aktualni problemy rozvytku ekonomiky rehionu, vol. 7(2), pp. 57-61.

Illiashenko S.M. (2013), “Components of economic security of the enterprise and approaches to its evaluation”, Actual problems of the economy, no. 3, pp. 13–19.

Korobchynskyi O. L. (2009), “Method of formation of the system of economic security of the enterprise”, Actual problems of the economy,, no. 4, pp. 41-45.

Published
2018-12-28
How to Cite
I.I., N. (2018). VECTOR OF PRIORITY ALTERNATIVES PROVIDING ECONOMIC SAFETY OF THE ENTERPRISE. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, (6), 27-36. Retrieved from http://www.ei-journal.in.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/140
Section
Theoretical and empirical research